REPORTS ARCHIVE
This section houses reports detailing the IPP sentence by Government, universities and third sector organisations. From early concerns about proportionality and mental health, to a ban by the
European Court of Human Rights, and the far reaching devastation caused to those who
were given the IPP, their familIes, and their children.
A HELPING HAND: SUPPORTING FAMILIES IN THE RESETTLEMENT OF PEOPLE SERVING IPPS
Harry Annison & Christina Straub.
University of Southampton and Prison Reform Trust
NO LIFE, NO FREEDOM, NO FUTURE
Dr. Kimmett Edgar, Dr. Mia Harris and Russell Webster
Prison Reform Trust
SENTENCES OF IMPRISONMENT FOR PUBLIC PROTECTION
Jacqueline Beard
House of Commons Briefing Paper
THE PAINS OF INDETERMINATE IMPRISONMENT FOR FAMILIES OF IPP PRISONERS: ASSESSING HARMS AND FINDING SOLUTIONS
Harry Annison and Rachel Condry
University of Southampton and University of Oxford
TOO MANY BENDS IN THE TUNNEL? WOMEN SERVING INDETERMINATE SENTENCES OF IMPRISONMENT FOR PUBLIC PROTECTION – WHAT ARE THE BARRIERS TO RISK REDUCTION, RELEASE AND RESETTLEMENT?
Sarah Smart
The Griffins Society
‘RECONSIDERATION’ EXPLAINED. A CHANGE IN THE WAY PRISONERS AND VICTIMS CAN ASK FOR A PAROLE BOARD DECISION TO BE RECONSIDERED.
Janine Doolan
STATEMENT ON IPP PRISONERS FROM THE PAROLE BOARD CHAIRMAN, NICK HARDWICK
Note that Nick Hardwick is no longer the Parole Board Chair
UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES: FINDING A WAY FORWARD FOR PRISONERS SERVING SENTENCES OF IMPRISONMENT FOR PUBLIC PROTECTION. A THEMATIC REVIEW BY HM INSPECTORATE OF PRISONS
HM Inspectorate of Prisons
SENTENCES OF IMPRISONMENT FOR PUBLIC PROTECTION
Pat Strickland
House of Commons Briefing Paper
THE NEVER-ENDING STORY: INDETERMINATE SENTENCING AND THE PRISON REGIME
Howard League for Penal Reform